Critical review of paper+ powerpoint slides Literature

Critical of paper+ powerpoint slides - publications review ExampleThe research addressed factors that what would make someone a good pharmacist and shared work situations that would made them uncomfortable ,or where pharmacist have to make compromises with regards to laws and make hard choices through overlord judgement and decision making skills. The aim is to analyse pharmacy values across the profession .The a sample technique was adopted. It included 38 participants including 18 community pharmacists, 10 hospitals and 10 others (containing primary allot trusts, senior management positions and academia). The pharmacists were chosen from variety of geographical locations, different ages, gender, experiences, employment statuses and ethnicities.The participants were selected via a snowballing process. It begin with contacts of the invent team and was taken forward through referrals both from participants and associated institutional gatekeepers.The interviews were recorded and transcribed. The principles of grounded theory informed the analytical process. The analytical process involved the summarising , categorising and linking of significant collection of data (open coding) which was then merged into larger sets (axial codes).A process was run of constant comparision was used within and across interviews and both open and axial codes were revise frequently. The paper presented data analysis followed by a discussion of.steps that were taken to ensure the validity and dependability of the work. The first nine transcripts were read and analysed by all the authors. Emerging analysis was presented to the pharmacy audience and feedback was taken to rives. The data was corrected and refined according to analytical categories.To understand the values of pharmacy practitioners it is important for the data to come directly or indirectly from the pharmacists. The method used is a purposive sampling so that the