Terrorism - Using Social Security to Fight Bush’s War :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Using Social Security to Fight bush-leagues War   I have a rational disquietude a fear that the September 11th attack has given the scouring administration a free hand in pursuing a conservative domestic agenda. This has so far been unspeakable in the media. only if it must be said, lest it happen for sure.   Where is the $40 gazillion for the warfare on terror approaching from? Not from a rise in taxes and not from sacrifices to be made by the rich. Where then? The only available beginning I can think of is the Social Security lockbox, which is now unspecific open. The conservatives have been trying to raid the Social Security fund for most time, and the Democrats had fought them off until now. Before September 11, the suggestion to take $40 billion from the Social Security surplus would have been indefensible. Has it now been d wiz-with every elective senator voting for it and all but one of the Democrats in Congress?   specify of it Are your retirement cont ributions-and mine-are going to fight Bushs war. No one dares to mouth approximately it that way. Its just $40 billion, as if it came out of nowhere. No one says that $40 billion dollars comes from your retirement contributions. No one talks about increasing taxes. We should at least ask just where the money is coming from.   If the money is coming from social security, then Bush has achieved a study goal of his partisan conservative agenda-without fanfare, without notice, and with the support of virtually all Democrats.   job for war, instead of mere justice, has given the conservatives free rein. I fear it result only be a matter of time before they seize that we need to drill for oil in the Alaskan Wildlife Refuge for study security reasons. If that most pristine place falls, they will use the internal security excuse to drill and mine coal all everywhere the country. The energy program will be pushed through as a matter of national security. All social programs will be ignore for lack of funds, which will be diverted to national security.   Cheney has said that this war may never be completed. Newt Gingrich estimates at least quatern or five years, certainly past the 2004 election. With no definition of conquest and no exit strategy, we may be entering a severalise of perpetual war.