Debate on British Monarchy

Good evening, everybody. Today I am going to bring in the regard on should the British Monarchy be pulverize or non. I will talk on both(prenominal) sides and would like everyone to pay attention so that you all post be part of this discussion. The British monarchy can be discussed in Britain as wellhead and if it did have a vote the result outcome would be extend to and would have a stronger and much than interesting debate. In UK the power of the butt mole rat is not much as a head of state or in the government simply more in representing the expanse. In Pakistan and the US the president would be the same power as the Prime parson in UK.T here(predicate) are many reasons we should get rid of the monarchy here are they Many times it has been the case that the monarch is not British and from approximately(prenominal)where else. The questions which raises in everyones mind is that, I am British and still a worker, scarcely she is from somewhere else and a monarch? why does she deserve it? This has a very harsh effect on the raft and the state, since she might be helping her domain with the money from the British people. She brings more people into to UK to work and earn money from there.The cigarette regnant is not pregnant because she does not participate in the government or running the country the job is done by the Prime minister. The nevertheless thing she does is signs the last-place bill so that it becomes a law. Unfortunately she does not check it, or read it. The parliament decides amongst them by using a vote and debate system and decides on the bill. The queen is there used as a signer. There is a fact that it brings tourism and makes the country more popular, notwithstanding that even wastes money. You have to give the money to the queen for sitting and dormancy and eating all day.For typeface when the people come they buy souvenirs solely they even occlusive here and we serve them. We have to have more space and more habit ats for them to live. That equals a lot The queen does not even have the power to raise her voice in from of the government, since she does not participate in the issues and country development the citizens think she does not exist. She does not even come out in public and talk she fair(a) sleeps. For example a riot is happening out there but she is still having her tea on time and not deciding or thinking of a solution.She takes enough money as a someone on high level would take in a yr she takes it in a month, for example I get 300,000 rupees a year, but she takes it in a click. What does she do with that nothing keeps it because the country takes care of the cost she uses regarding the country Now I have brought the discussion of the monarchy to be demolished to an end and will start to give my voice about guardianship the monarch. You can take a short break and have snacks and and then I will carry on. Why should we spoil a customs duty of centuries of Britain that there would be kings and queens in Britain to rule it?There are so many monarchs who have done well for the country and some who have taken action on the parliament. Just like magnate Anne of Britain who refused to the bill because she read it and checked it not only signed it. The queen helps Britain a lot because they are the ones who created the British parliament. The British created 209 years on contendds from today. Since the queen has not many jobs she still focuses only on Britain and its development. It gives some people to show off for their country. The queen and the palace bring a lot of tourism and more of the population to Britain to show off as well.For example if something cool happens like taking a signature of a popular movie star makes you look cool, but nevertheless the queen acts like a figure to help you show off. Not only that but she at least plays a role in the country and gets very popular just like that. Some people enjoin it is good to keep because she keeps good relations with other countries and has contact and can take help from them. Such as when they are in war or in violent states there are other countries which sustain and help them. The queen can even make friends with Britain, but they were enemies before.The queen is a symbolic figure and has a status throughout the world. For example when she goes to other countries or in her own country is not take away by shoes or people say bad things or protest against her. Her hands which she wears gloves is so powerful that is makes the countries friends. And the hand keeps everyone united in the UK. Ladies and gentlemens I have brought myself to a conclusion that the queen should stay because she is a generation of the others who were there centuries ago. She represents the history of Britain.